Site icon EndurantDevs

Software Development: Balancing Between Hands-On and Hands-Off Management

Software Development: Balancing Between Hands-On and Hands-Off Management

Portrait of mature businessman looking at camera and sitting at desk while workers in background. Photo by SalFalko (https://www.flickr.com/photos/safari_vacation/)

Efficient managers always want to achieve the goals their company has. In most cases, this is not possible without an engaged team. Most employees feel comfortable and do their job the best way possible only if they have great interactions with their boss. So, this means that you need to provide them with everything they need to make them highly motivated and get what you need according to the goals you have.

Type of management has a huge influence on employees. There are a lot of stories about a good or bad usage of both types of management: hands-on and hands-off. In this article, I will try to go through my experience to give some comments on both types.

In different sources, hands-on management is often a synonym of micromanagement. And, if we talk about computer software development, “micromanagement” is usually used as a bad term. So, here is an example of the bad side of this management type: employees may feel not comfortable about too much attention paid to what they do without any specific need. Also, it may limit efforts of people and their ideas. Even if your staff is ok about the fact that you dig into their work deeply, this may start a “mommy syndrome”, and your team will not do anything without confirmation from your side. However, in most cases, hands-on managers have a comprehensive understanding of the product and its details. They will help their team with ideas and suggestions.

I heard many times that hands-off manager gives more freedom to his employees, but the question is whether a team would go for their advice or will try to solve problems by themselves in critical moments when a real manager’s help will be needed. And, also, if you see the guy who talks only about KPIs and different types of a team efficiency measurement – this is a hands-off manager.

To achieve the best interaction with your team, I would use a mix of both ways:

Interacting with your team shows them that you need what they do. However, an active interaction may have an influence on other managers in your company. So, please, be careful with going over the heads of other people in order not to make them think that you do not believe in their decisions, as this is how conflicts are commonly created. It is very hard to fix the problems raised by such conflicts.

There is no difference if you work with a few developers or with a team of managers, people want to see a helpful leader who knows answers to most of their questions, hears their opinion and that you are sure about the direction the company goes. Situation dictates whether you need to be a hands-on or hands-off manager. So balancing between these types will help you to achieve the goals of your business.

Exit mobile version